Your message dated Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:54:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new package in debian archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2002 11:39:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 05:39:00 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mons.uio.no [129.240.130.14] (7411)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16QRvb-0001RX-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 05:38:55 -0600
Received: from radames.uio.no ([129.240.96.172])
by mons.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 16QRvV-0005kA-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:38:49 +0100
Received: from oka by radames.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 16QRvV-0001v1-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:38:49 +0100
From: Ole Aamot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: gphoto2 -- The gphoto2 digital camera library
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ole Kristian Aamot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:38:49 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: critical
I don't seem to have the time to maintain gphoto2 properly for the
Debian project. I'm orphaning the package immediately and I'm not
considering to do official development for Debian anymore.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 129352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2002 14:54:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 01 08:54:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from charger.oldcity.dca.net [207.245.82.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Wf5U-0002vM-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 08:54:48 -0600
Received: from turing (adsl-207-245-72-99.cust.oldcity.dca.net [207.245.72.99])
by charger.oldcity.dca.net (8.11.6/8.9.3/DCANET) with ESMTP id
g11Esll22906
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:54:47 -0500
Received: from barbe by turing with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16Wf5O-0003J0-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:54:42 -0500
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:54:41 -0500
From: christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new package in debian archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WeojGOqAOUQyw5FN"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i
X-Operating-System: debian SID Gnu/Linux 2.4.17 on i586
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--WeojGOqAOUQyw5FN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A new package is in the debian archive.
This closes the O-ITA story.
Christophe
--=20
Christophe Barb=E9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
--WeojGOqAOUQyw5FN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Pour information voir http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8Wqwxj0UvHtcstB4RApNFAKCKwB3fVD80U83v5ECwM0sdefBJ2ACeOuqa
LVNNUI8/ePIMe4h/w4+6Iuw=
=TChn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WeojGOqAOUQyw5FN--
