On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:34:39PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:19:11PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:16:08PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > > > Is this an ITA: or RFA: ? > > > > Looks like either an ITP or RFP, since there is no dnstracer in sid. > > Well, yes :) That's why I was asking! Anyway, the bug title is changed now > so it's ITA.
You misunderstood. An ITA is an intention to adopt a package, meaning that the package is already in Debian and the submitter intends to adopt it. That's why this package was obviously NOT an ITA or RFA (request for adoption). The submitter has retitled it to an ITP. -- - mdz
