Hello, good question. I tend to answer yes, because I can not think of another way to reflect the underlying PPPD version.
Kind Regards Werner Jaeger ________________________________________ From: Roger Leigh [rle...@codelibre.net] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 4:12 PM To: Jaeger, Werner; 602...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: Re: Bug#602503: ITP: ppp-2.4.5-eaptls-mppe -- PPP daemon with EAP-TLS authentication support On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:48:32PM +0100, Werner Jaeger wrote: > Package name : ppp-2.4.5-eaptls-mppe Does the package name really need the version number encoded into it? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/634cfd657e419946bd70654e385a708f018c38f...@he111508.emea1.cds.t-internal.com
