Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:46:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2001 21:29:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 10 16:29:53 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spoon.edu.lahti.fi (edu.lahti.fi) [212.226.80.23]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15gYcr-00026h-00; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:29:53 -0500
Received: (qmail 31869 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 21:09:47 -0000
Received: from nexus.edu.lahti.fi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.edu.lahti.fi with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 21:09:47 -0000
Received: by nexus.edu.lahti.fi (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Sep 2001
00:09:47 +0300
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:09:47 +0300
From: Pekka Aleksi Knuutila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: silc-client, silc-server, silc-toolkit and perhaps irssi-silc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Some old packages done by me for silc can be found at
http://master.debian.org/~pa/silc/.
Brief description about SILC from the FAQ, you can read more from
http://www.silcnet.org/:
SILC (Secure Internet Live Conferencing) is a protocol which provides
secure conferencing services in the Internet over insecure channel. SILC is
IRC like al internally they are very different. Biggest similarity between
SILC and IRC is t they both provide conferencing services and that SILC has
almost same commands a Other than that they are nothing alike.
Biggest differences are that SILC is secure what IRC is not in any way. The
netw model is also entirely different compared to IRC.
Licensed under the GPL.
--
my knees are bowed in crypt and shrine
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 111908-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 13:46:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 09 07:46:54 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spoon.edu.lahti.fi (edu.lahti.fi) [212.226.80.23]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16D4IA-0000i6-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 07:46:54 -0600
Received: (qmail 29353 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2001 13:46:52 -0000
Received: from nexus.edu.lahti.fi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.edu.lahti.fi with SMTP; 9 Dec 2001 13:46:52 -0000
Received: by nexus.edu.lahti.fi (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 9 Dec 2001
15:46:52 +0200
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:46:52 +0200
From: Pekka Aleksi Knuutila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: already packaged
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Already packaged by Tamas Szerb.
