Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:58:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#110240: fixed in kernel-patch-ttl 2.4.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2001 07:51:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 27 02:51:32 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (piro.kabuki.sfarc.net) [203.36.158.121] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15bHBD-0003oA-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 02:51:32 -0500
Received: by piro.kabuki.sfarc.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EF46E14AC961; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:51:27 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:51:27 +1000
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RFA: kernel-patch-ttl -- TTL matching and setting
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Organisation: Sadly lacking
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-27
Severity: normal
See below. :)
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:48:17PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I no longer have the time to do this. It's rather quick to do a new version,
> I do the following:
> cd /usr/local/src/debian
> for i in irc ttl ulog; do mv kernel-patch-$i-* kernel-patch-$i-$ver; cd
> kernel-patch-$i-$ver/kernel-patch-$i-* && dch -v $ver-1; done
> mkdir kernel-source-$ver
> cd kernel-source-$ver
> sudo apt-get source kernel-source-$ver
> for i in irc ttl ulog; do mv kernel-patch-$i-* kernel-patch-$i-$ver; cd
> kernel-patch-$i-$ver/kernel-patch-$i-* && dch -v $ver-1; cd
> ../kernel-source-$ver; cp -al kernel-source-$ver-$ver
> kernel-source-$ver-$ver-$i; done
> cd /usr/local/src/netfilter/userspace/patch-o-matic &&
> KERNEL_DIR=/usr/local/src/debian/kernel-source-$ver-$ver-irc ./runme
> irc-conntrack-nat.patch
> cd /usr/local/src/netfilter/userspace/patch-o-matic &&
> KERNEL_DIR=/usr/local/src/debian/kernel-source-$ver/kernel-source-$ver-$ver-ttl
> ./runme TTL.patch ttl.patch
> cd /usr/local/src/netfilter/userspace/patch-o-matic &&
> KERNEL_DIR=/usr/local/src/debian/kernel-source-$ver/kernel-source-$ver-$ver-ulog
> ./runme ulog.patch
> for i in irc ttl ulog; do diff -urN kernel-source-$ver-$ver
> kernel-source-$ver-$ver-$i >
> ../kernel-patch-$i-$ver/kernel-patch-$i-$ver/$i-$ver; cd
> ../kernel-patch-$i-$ver/kernel-patch-$i-$ver && debuild; done
>
> Hmm, yes.
> -d
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux piro 2.4.9-xfs #1 Sun Aug 19 22:27:13 EST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<OldMonk> Here I am, a brain the size of a planet and all they can say is,
`How do I setup my PPP?''
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 110240-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2001 19:20:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 14:20:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15j3wS-0000Jp-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:20:28 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15j3b7-0001SB-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:58:25 -0400
From: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.59 $
Subject: Bug#110240: fixed in kernel-patch-ttl 2.4.7-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:58:25 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-patch-ttl, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-ttl/kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.dsc
kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-ttl/kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.tar.gz
kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-ttl/kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kernel-patch-ttl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:40:13 +0200
Source: kernel-patch-ttl
Binary: kernel-patch-ttl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-patch-ttl - TTL matching and setting
Closes: 110240
Changes:
kernel-patch-ttl (2.4.7-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Adopted package, changed maintainer (closes: #110240)
* Updated (horribly outdated) standards version
Files:
57a43dbede5c06de6670d1f87175d065 584 devel extra kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.dsc
73c3875b874552ae2c1395eb46793f5c 5981 devel extra
kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4.tar.gz
6557d0dae35b6149185d3f484a496d5d 15714 devel extra
kernel-patch-ttl_2.4.7-4_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7oeCPBOdjEO/Bh3ARAkTqAJ0bIoCgyjXOIetHL49yJZqp1X+yUACfSFSm
vwijB6Re4kTAwnl+wyaLKLM=
=9vfm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
