Your message dated 01 Sep 2001 21:10:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line successor to STk already packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2000 00:13:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 31 19:13:49 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmagallo by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13JPgq-0000r9-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:13:48 -0500
From: "Christian Lynbech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Christian Lynbech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: STk -- Scheme Tk, a scheme interpreter with Tk support
X-Mailer: feedbts -- Flames to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marcelo Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:13:48 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Submitted: 19970526
The person listed as the submitter of this bug has stated his intention to
package STk -- Scheme Tk, a scheme interpreter with Tk support.
If you are interested in this package, and the ITP was submited a long time
ago (3 months or so), the prospective maintainer can be reached via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you contact him, please remember to be
polite, Debian maintainers are volunteers, and Read Life has the nasty habit
of getting in the way. Once you upload the package and it's installed on the
archive, please remember to close this bug (or include a Closes: bug#nnnnn
statement on your changelog).
This report was automatically fed into the BTS database. The original
submission date to the WNPP system was 19970526.
You are getting a copy of this mail because your emai address was
listed on the WNPP as the person who submited the original request to the
system.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68233-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2001 19:11:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 01 14:11:00 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from arioch.oche.de [194.94.252.126] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15dGAV-0003BT-00; Sat, 01 Sep 2001 14:11:00 -0500
Received: (qmail 7006 invoked by uid 10); 1 Sep 2001 19:10:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 2013 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Sep 2001 19:10:08 -0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: successor to STk already packaged
From: Carsten Leonhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 01 Sep 2001 21:10:06 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm closing this ITP for STk because:
- STklos is the successor of STk, and STklos is already packaged
- according to the BTS, this ITP is more than 4 years old
- Christian Lynbech, who did the ITP, still hasn't responded to an
enquiry of October 14, 2000 from Adrian Bunk if he's still going to
package the thing
leo
