On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:57 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of > > > being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really > > > work that well. > > > > I strongly suggest to not introduce this package in sarge then. Do you > > object? It has no reverse dependencies at all. Or is this new "HAL GNOME > > Power sytem" not yet ready in sarge? (what's the packagename?) > > I see no reason for battfink to be in Sarge. This "HAL GNOME Power > system" has only just started, but will replace everything Battfink > does. > > Battfink was originally created as the standard battery applet in GNOME > sucked, but it doesn't any more. Die battfink die!
Right, than I also propose to remove it from unstable then :). Do you agree? --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
