On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:10:32PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > I think that Elimar can handle it without any problems if only he > > would fix his packages, so it would stick to Debian rules. I have no > > access to ppc arch. so Elimar if you are interested, contact Fenio > > (or other developer if Fenio is not interested in uploading moc) and > > take care of it. > > Thanks. I am interested to maintain moc. Is that possible Fenio?
Sure it is. As I said I wasn't maintainer of this package. I was only a sponsor for Michal's upload. Now when he agrees to give you maintainence then feel free to maintain it. > The latest beta packages are avilable now: > > deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv binary-powerpc/ > deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv binary-i386/ > deb-src http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv sources/ > > linda and lintian are happy now;-) Hm... so do you want me to be your sponsor? > > I started from 2.1.4 as it is stable version of moc. I would have > > waited until 2.2.0 is stable. My philosophy might be wrong, but I > > don't think it is too paranoid, though. > > Same on me. I suggest to upload 2.2.0 stable. Don't panic. NEW queue isn't handled since last days of December so it will take some time till this package will enter sid. And there is always way to upload new package before that. And all in all sid is an _unstable_ distribution. If there will be some problems then someone will fill RC bug, and this package won't enter sarge. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
