Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250414: fixed in lush 1.0+final-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 20:26:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 22 13:26:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216.184.11.30.unused.swcp.com (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRd4n-0000Wa-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 13:26:37 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
by boa.b9.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i4MKQac4011877;
Sat, 22 May 2004 14:26:36 -0600
Received: from tiger.med-info.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
i4MKQaCu021757;
Sat, 22 May 2004 14:26:36 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i4MKQaUr021754;
Sat, 22 May 2004 14:26:36 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: lush - Lisp Universal Shell
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:26:36 -0600
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Due to lack of time and the fact that I don't use the package, I'm offering
lush for adoption.
Upstream has been responsive and development active. It's a nice
program for people who a Lisp-like language with good C compatibility,
high numeric performance, and a graphical user interface.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250414-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 18:25:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 10:25:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzJ0R-0003hO-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:25:35 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzIsS-0006K9-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:20 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#250414: fixed in lush 1.0+final-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:20 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: lush
Source-Version: 1.0+final-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lush, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
lush-library_1.0+final-1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lush/lush-library_1.0+final-1_all.deb
lush_1.0+final-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.0+final-1.diff.gz
lush_1.0+final-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.0+final-1.dsc
lush_1.0+final-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.0+final-1_i386.deb
lush_1.0+final.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.0+final.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lush package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:38:00 +0100
Source: lush
Binary: lush-library lush
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0+final-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
lush - Lisp Universal Shell Executable
lush-library - Lisp Universal Shell Library
Closes: 250414 287626
Changes:
lush (1.0+final-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #250414).
* New upstream release.
* debian/* redone.
* fixed lintian errors.
* src/{date.c,index.c}: fixed FTBS on amd64/gcc-4.0 (Closes: #287626).
Files:
482bac379177560afd1c844a979fd35d 628 devel extra lush_1.0+final-1.dsc
62ea0245a0cd0413edaaa4344f87a466 4155938 devel extra lush_1.0+final.orig.tar.gz
0aa488ee176947b9b62d818344483d9d 3844 devel extra lush_1.0+final-1.diff.gz
05e37bd97b4d9d1aa1e4c1bbec6fb7cf 1339116 devel extra lush_1.0+final-1_i386.deb
91c61cb5b5eefbd106b21bdb63701447 4463088 devel extra
lush-library_1.0+final-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkILnw0ACgkQELuA/Ba9d8bv4ACaA8etdAFtw+hDQMcCphtDXJ0n
VuIAn2VuT4wjfOSJbiyfYQd1ujnXOWSr
=uyhX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
