At 2004-03-26T20:07:59Z, Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The "no binary attachments outside of alt.binaries" dogma has been around
> for forever, and is intended primarily to avoid the wrath of news
> administrators.

I'd never considered that, but it makes sense.  I filter my feed by group
name and message size, not the presence of attachments, and didn't realize
that some people did.

Still, every newsgroup charter I've found that mentions attachments at all
makes an explicit exception for PGP signatures.  It was my understanding
that those were universally accepted.  At least, that's what I thought until
I posted to sci.physics.  :)
-- 
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to