On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Paul Johnson wrote: > Krikket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've played with a bunch of Debian variations, and have come to the > > conclusion that I want a Debian (sid) install on my system. > > Given that it tends to live up to it's (unstable) name, why? > Seriously, what is in sid that you want that bad that you cannot get > From backports.org? Sid is *not* for people new to Debian.
It's still more stable than some of the other flavors of Linux that I've used. (IE: Fedora...) The reason for going with sid is that I was of the understanding that the security patches don't come out quite as quickly for the testing branch. Am I wrong? Krikket -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
