On Monday 15 March 2004 00:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are all the following going to be removed too? (not clear with the [] > parenthesis). >
I am not clear either. Said 7 to be removed but then lists all those others in brackets. > x-window-system and x-window-system-core are virtual dependency > packages so you don't really need them. Figured this much. Never had them before until last week :-) > xlibmesa-gl and xlibmesa-dri are being replaced by the new package > (which provides xlibmesa-gl iirc). Will this monster work? BTW, an upgraded agpgart behaves far differently in loading, even without a mach64 module in 2.6.3. I tried booting the old kernel to see if 2.4 version will work now. Panics in boot--maybe should rerun lilo. Maybe time to leave 2.4 behind? > The dev files are a problem. They depend on specific versions of the > originals which is why they are being removed. They are needed to > compile some things not for standard operation. The main issue IIRC is > that libqt3-mt-dev is needed for make xconfig under 2.6, but you can do > make gconfig instead. Needed for most other compiles as well. I rarely get it work but.... > Another option is to open the xlibmesa-gl-dev package and remove the > version dependency in it (problematic but works). IIRC all the other > problematic devs are through a dependency with that one apt-get --ignore-dependancies ?? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
