Ooops: On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 09:44, Nick THOMPSON accidentally wrote the following in HTML and would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused: > I don't think thats it. I was upgrading from 2.2.20 to 2.4.18-1-586tsc > (what does the tsc mean?) and I think it was seeing the appropriate > /lib/modules directory. I did rename the 2.2.20 dir anyway, but it > didn't help at all. > > Seems the 3c509 driver thinks it has found two ethernet ports, 0x220 > and 0x300 IIRC on IRQ 5 and 10 respectively. I'm sure I only have the > one though. eth0 in ifconfig -a actually does seem to have a correct > IP address (10.0.0.60) and says it has sent out packets, though RXed > none. eth1 is not even configured, but then it doesn't exist.... > > I still get complaints about /etc/modules.conf being newer than > /lib/modules/2.4.18-1-586tsc/modules.dep. Each boot a lot of time is > spent generating the modules dependencies, but it looks like that is > never saved. I guess this issue should be sorted out first before I > start to wonder about why the ethernet doesn't work...? > > Did I mess up upgrading the kernel, by only doing and "apt-get install > kernel-image-..."? Was there some other magic I missed that would have > smoothed the upgrade? > > Thanks, > Nick. > > On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 19:35, Sylvain Cauchon wrote: > > Nick THOMPSON wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm new to Debian and am considering switching over from Mandrake. I > > > have a test installation installed just last week (woody network > > > install) that was working well. I easily upgraded it to KDE3.2 and then > > > attempted an upgrade of the kernel to the latest stable for woody > > > (2.4.18 IIRC). Anyway, I started out the kernel upgrade with a single > > is still loaded automatically, but I do get a warning that my > > > /etc/modules.conf is newer that my blah-blah-blah.dep file several times > > > during the boot sequence. Sorry - don't remember the file name. > > > > > > Any ideas as to how I should proceed from here would be very gratefully > > > received. > > > > > > > Hi There, > > Sounds like you did not rename your modules before proceeding with the > > installation of a new kernel image of the same version. Is this the > > case? if so you should rename your old /lib/modules/2.x.x tol > > /lib/modules/old2.x.x. this will allow the newer kernel to access the > > correct modules hope this helps bye for now syl
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]