On February 24, 2004 17:23, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * David P James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040224 10:53]: > > I can't view Java applets on websites anymore (I'm pretty sure I > > used to be able to > 1 year ago). Here's an example of where this > > is happening, but it applies to every site using a Java applet: > > > > http://www.queensu.ca/surp/index.htm > > WFM. > > Mozilla 1.6 > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 > Debian/1.6-1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ > total 32 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2004-02-06 10:49 . > drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 2004-02-02 14:21 .. > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 73 2004-02-06 10:49 > libjavaplugin_oji.so -> > /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.2_03/jre/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oj >i.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20080 2004-01-21 22:37 > libnullplugin.so > > I'd check to make sure you're linking to the gcc32 version. >
~$ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ total 1484 ... lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 67 2004-02-24 00:15 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/java/j2re1.4.2_03/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so ... Yep, I'm using the gcc32 version so that's not it. The only difference I can tell is that you're using an sdk version whilst I'm using an re version. Yours is also slightly larger. I installed mine from a .rpm that was converted to a .deb using alien. Is there any good reason that the plugin that comes with an re version should be smaller than that that comes with an sdk version? Or the same question with respect to a converted .rpm? I guess I'll try again later on with the one you used. -- David P James Ottawa, Ontario http://members.rogers.com/dpjames/ There is no art which one government sooner learns of another than that of draining money from the pockets of the people. -Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
