On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:01:46PM +0000, Pigeon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:56:03PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +0000, Pigeon wrote: > > > > I say this because I've just broken a remote box doing an apt-get > > > > upgrade - security upgrades to woody - which Isn't Supposed To Happen. > > > > Don't know exactly how, because ssh is one of the things that broke... > > > > > > Is it just me, or has package quality been suffering since the > > > developers had to start tracking three versions instead of two, making > > > up to 33 packages of the same software, one for each version on each > > > architecture (instead of up to 22)? > > > > I don't believe that that has a significant effect: firstly, it's not > > significant effort to keep track of, and secondly, most developers don't > > bother to keep track of what's running on other architectures all that > > often. I can certainly personally guarantee you that it has absolutely > > no effect on ssh. > > > > If you track down a specific problem with ssh (as opposed to random > > sniping about package quality), I'll be more than happy to fix it as > > best I can. > > I'm not sniping, I'm just puzzled.
I know you weren't; I was referring to Paul's remark about package quality, which came right out of left field. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
