On 2004-02-13, Andreas Janssen penned: > > I think pico belongs to pine (although it seems there are also no > installable pine packes in stable). Nano is a pico clone (at least the > package description says it is, I never used pico). Nano is part of > the base system and probably is already installed. >
Pico is a pine thing, and iirc pine has some weird license. Here's what I found in a *very* brief google search: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00138.html -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
