On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Jan Minar wrote: > links is an awful botch. Designwise, it's to browsers what MS-DOS is to > OS's. > > > I don't much care for lynx output either. Is there a good way to get > > table-oriented html pages into a text editor properly? > > w3m(1). It even has some Emacs integration. >
The only text-mode browser I used to know was lynx. Then I discovered links. Then I thought I read that links was frozen, and new development was going on in elinks. So now I'm using elinks. But I thought I read here the other day that *now* links is the one being developped and elinks is the problem. Now there's w3m. Can someone rank order why'd I'd prefer one of these? Do I need more than one on my system? Me = confused -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
