tom arnall wrote:
> What you described about the use of random numbers by neural networks is
> incorrect.
All analogies are incorrect. This one is useful.
> if you actually want to understand how they work, you might start by
... getting a complete computer science education, including sitting
next to someone inventing recursive neural networks and deciding that
it would need far too many computrons to be worth anything (correct,
in 1995)... or having a career in running large systems, then security,
then in advising people on what not to do.
AI is cocaine. The people who use it love it and want everyone else
to use it, and are completely blind to any negative effect on the
world. ("Sure it causes red eyes and my nose lining is falling out
and the cost is completely unsustainable, but my dealer is giving big
discounts right now!")
Everyone else wants to know why these losers are burning the world,
and could they stop please?
This is now off-topic for Debian, so I'll shut up. Also, plonk.
-dsr-
