On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:18:11 +0100 Michel Verdier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-01-07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > > It would be better if AI had more clue and thus could be less > > misleading. > > We can't give them more as they already can fetch so much data, such > as this list archives. I think they need better intelligence to > better use their data. > > And AI questions would use our time (personnally I only read the > first 2 paragraphs as they are so badly shaped) to generate more > money for the owners. If they need real humans to improve their AI > they should have to pay them (and already do that). > The problem is that 'AI' is a hoax, there is no 'I'. What we have now is ELIZA with about a trillion times as many computer resources, but not a single bit more actual intelligence, since we don't know how to make that. It's a large-scale expert system that hasn't been trained by experts. -- Joe
