On 2025-05-16, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu May 15, 2025 at 2:33 PM BST, Dan Ritter wrote: >> The most prominent issue I can see is that there is no unified >> sense of chronology. That is, I can look at a page and not have >> any idea whether it is correct for current Stable.
That's what I said more succinctly. Keep the wikis up to date (I thought it went without saying "for Debian stable," though there's always a myriad of ways to be misunderstood but normally only one way to be so). > Thank you. That is useful feedback, and I agree that we should be clear > about what version of Debian a given page (or section) applies to. (And > we should default to documenting Debian stable, IMHO) > > I suggested we establish a standard way to do this as part of someone > else's efforts to write fresh content guidelines¹. I should pick that > effort back up and finish it off. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/MaythamAlsudany/DraftContentGuidelines/Discussion >
