On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 12:32, Brad Rogers <b...@fineby.me.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:01:06 +0000 David <bouncingc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Because you are running this: > > > > https://www.deb-multimedia.org/dists/testing/main/binary-arm64/package/handbrake > >which is not packaged by Debian. > > Good point, well made. > > I failed to spot that - because I'm so used to having Debian Multimedia > (DMO) available to me. > > Trouble is, I find, some people will scream bloody murder if one even > mentions DMO. Admittedly, there can be pitfalls, but I've never had an > issue that I couldn't overcome whilst using DMO. Hi, according to [1], the DMO 'handbrake' package contains nothing executable at all, and according to [2] it appears to have epoch=1, which I suspect will take precedence over the Debian package of the same name which actually contains executables but has epoch=0. So the issue arose because DMO splits 'handbrake' into 3 packages (handbrake, handbrake-cli,handbrake-gtk) one of which contains nothing executable. Whereas Debian uses only 2 packages and puts the GUI version into the 'handbrake' package. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2025/04/msg00726.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2025/04/msg00727.html
