On Sunday, 20-04-2025 at 23:45 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 4/20/25 7:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> I'm restarting a editing project that could take advantage of using
> >> "regular
> >> expressions".
> >>
> >> I had stated using Kate for the project.
> >>
> >> I'm reviewing my regular expression related web searches. It would be
> >> helpful if I could find a _single_ document that made comparison
> >> between/among Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart. [e.g. package goals]
> >
> > Now I'm confused: regular expressions or package comparisons?
>
> My "universe of discourse" is a collection of references discussing the
> use of "regular expressions".
>
> A significant number of which mention Kate *or* Kwrite *or* Katepart.
> I need to understand the entity goals of Kate, Kwrite, and Katepart.
> I.E. In a discussion of "regular expressions", does it matter which of
> those packages is referred to?
>
> Clearer?
Sorry, but I do not understand the meaning of your words:
"universe of discourse"
"entity goals"
And I am confused by this sentences:
"A significant number of which mention Kate *or* Kwrite *or* Katepart."
"In a discussion of "regular expressions", does it matter which of those
packages is referred to?"
Maybe I need more sleep. Apologies. I hope someone understands and can answer
your questions.
I am guessing you are talking about:
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/regular-expressions.html
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/katepart/regular-expressions.html
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kwrite/index.html (I presume kwrite does
not support regular expressions)
If I have understood your query (which seems unlikely), is the answer:
Kwrite does not support regular expressions whil eKate and Katepart support the
same regular expressions as defined in
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/katepart/regular-expressions.htm
George.
>
> >
> > About the packages you mention I can't say much. If you have more
> > concrete regular expression questions, I'm happy to chime in.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
>
>
