On 2/24/24, Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 01:35:14PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> I wrote: >> > You seem by now to have ignored multiple messages where it was made >> > clear that the work was already done. >> >> Assuming we care about the most rapid healing possible for those who >> are actually triggered by certain words in one or another language, >> there is a valid position to consider that is to increase, not >> decrease, exposure to and therefore the broader usage of, triggering >> words. >> >> If we care about healing wounds, we ought not remove the catalysts to >> that healing. > > I did wonder how long it would take for someone to go from, "it's > terrible that you activists are MAKING someone do this POINTLESS > non-technical work!" to "no one should use this thing someone did in > their own free time because it's bad, actually, for non-technical > reasons!"
Except "no one should use this thing someone did in their own free time because it's bad, actually, for non-technical reasons!" is not what I said. I suggest you reduce your occurrence of putting words in other people's mouths, which they did not say. Some folks consider that rude. Others might claim (validly) that you have a manipulative agenda. > Meanwhile I'd just appreciate hearing from actual users of it, since > I might be one, one day. You are welcome to invite user feedback.
