Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:23:50 +0900, Charles Muller wrote: > > > After my experience with MEPIS, I was kind of curious about the > > relationship between Knoppix and MEPIS from this respect. With MEPIS > > they clearly state that the kernel is altered, and one shouldn't use > > apt-get upgrade, dist-upgrade, etc. But apparently Knoppix is built in a > > different way and doesn't present the same kind of problem? If this is > > the case, I think I'm going to give it a shot. > > Shoot. I'm writing from a very stable Testing-ex-Knoppix3.3-24-09-03; with > updated sources.list, apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade. If this is > what you're asking.
Yes, that's it. I have one more question on the Mepis/Knoppix comparison, which I'm wondering if someone might be able to answer: One of the things I like best about Mepis is its excellent handling of video cards and display resolution settings--something that I always have had trouble with on standard Debian installations. How good is Knoppix at getting high resolutions, for example 1280 and above? Chuck --------------------------- Charles Muller Toyo Gakuen University Faculty of Humanities 1660 Hiregasaki, Nagareyama-shi Chiba 270-0161 JAPAN Web Site: Resources for East Asian Language and Thought http://www.acmuller.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
