Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > On 2024-01-12, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk > <debian-u...@howorth.org.uk> wrote: > > Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > >> On 2024-01-11, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > There was a thread that "home" as the top level domain might not > >> > be really safe (somebody might register it). A reserved domain > >> > is "home.arpa" so e.g. to have "thinkpad", the /etc/hosts entry > >> > should be > >> > > >> > 127.0.1.1 thinkpad.home.arpa thinkpad > >> > > >> > >> The .arpa domain is the “Address and Routing Parameter Area” > >> domain and is designated to be used exclusively for > >> Internet-infrastructure purposes. > >> > >> https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa > > > > Indeed, and a little way down that page it says: > > > > home.arpa For non-unique use in residential home networks > > RFC 8375 > > I missed that. > > Yet the reserved gTLDs from the 2018 ICANN resolution > are .home, .corp, and .mail. Does home.arpa comply with that > resolution?
I don't see there's any connection between that resolution and anything done within the .arpa gTLD. So there's no notion of 'complying'.
