David writes: > This forces _everybody_ to comply with American law: unilateral world > order by any other name.
It is not a uniquely USA law. It's part of an international scheme in which most governments participate. > A directly attributed, undisguised donation to an Assange fund, or any > other (because this applied to more than one isolated case) does not > qualify as `money-laundering'. I didn't say that it did. I said that preventing "money laundering" is what the scheme *purports* to do. > Yes, we definitely need something better than Paypal. I don't like PayPal either but you won't find any way to do international transactions without dealing with obnoxious regulations. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA
