Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 14, 2023, at 1:51 PM, David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On 12/14/23 08:04, Pocket wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2023, at 4:09 AM, David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Another benefit of ZFS snapshots is that they are are atomic.  (Yet another 
>>> is that they are taken quickly.)  So long as your app or service has its 
>>> files in a consistent state (ideally, closed), restoring from the snapshot 
>>> should produce a set of files that work correctly.
>> Radioactive I see
> 
> 
> Do not eat files that glow blue.  ;-)

My files glow Greene so I am safe
> 
> 
>>> On 12/13/23 10:42, Pocket wrote:
>>>> After removing raid, I completely redesigned my network to be more inline 
>>>> with the howtos and other information.
>>> 
>>> Please elaborate regarding "redesigned my network" with respect to not 
>>> needing RAID.
>> Gave me the impetus fix see the errors of my ways
> 
> 
> Please explain your ways and perhaps the readers will identity errors.


Nothing is broke so fixes not needed

> 
> 
>>>> I have a "git" server that has all my setup/custom/building scripts and 
>>>> all my programming and solidworks projects.
>>> 
>>> I assume your git(1) server has a repository and it is on a single disk 
>>> with rsync(1) backups.  If the repository disk crashes, you replace it with 
>>> another disk, and you restore from backup, what happens to clients who 
>>> checked out projects after the backup?  To clients that checked in changed 
>>> projects after the backup?  Is recovery less work that replacing a bad disk 
>>> in RAID?
>> You assume wrong
> 
> 
> Please explain how your git(1) server stores content without RAID, how 
> clients respond to the two scenarios outlined above, and how the recovery 
> effort compares to RAID recovery.
> 
> 
>>>> I have DELPHI build apps going back to about 1995.
>>> 
>>> Do you mean:
>>> 
>>> https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi
>> Nope Borland
> 
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Delphi_(software)
> 
> On February 8, 2006, Borland announced that it was looking for a buyer for 
> its IDE and database line of products, including Delphi, to concentrate on 
> its ALM line. Instead of selling it, Borland transferred the development 
> tools group to an independent, wholly owned subsidiary company named CodeGear 
> on November 14, 2006.
> ...
> Borland sold CodeGear to Embarcadero Technologies in 2008. Embarcadero 
> retained the CodeGear division created by Borland to identify its tool and 
> database offerings but identified its own database tools under the 
> DatabaseGear name.
> ...
> In October 2015, Embarcadero was purchased by Idera Software. Idera continues 
> to run the developer tools division under the Embarcadero brand.
> 

Nope Borland


> 
>>>> It all backed up to a backup server(master and slave) and also a 4TB 
>>>> offline external hard drive.  I have not "lost" any information since.
>>> 
>>> Please elaborate "master and slave" with respect to not needing RAID.
>> Same as DNS
> 
> 
> Do you mean using a distributed architecture similar to DNS for backups, or 
> something else?  Please explain.

Do you understand DNS?

> 
> 
> David
> 

Reply via email to