From: Greg Wooledge <g...@wooledge.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 07:08:33 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] zl5bsa9pgfixz...@wooledge.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎]
CAEG4cZXy=0lra4adonsaueeoafdyapoqf5cze3s1zerrjfs...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎]
CAEG4cZXe=BUQ5VE_z0rcLqHGGERdANnZ=vjiznjbk439jif...@mail.gmail.com>
<caeg4czxjfpb1e795uxbc1ksdvu918eil2v61sxtggace_gs...@mail.gmail.com>
<caeg4czugi3trbozz5mufymzxrn92krpndudcawjf_octdof...@mail.gmail.com>
<[🔎] CAEG4cZXy=0lra4adonsaueeoafdyapoqf5cze3s1zerrjfs...@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 03:52:38PM +0530, Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> Thank you for writing back with the link leading to the Python
> Discourse thread. I would have preferred a similar post assuring us
> from the Debian Side. Can't accept a third party website info on face
> value.
You're talking to the debian-user mailing list. We're all users
of Debian, and everything we tell you is "third party".
[ ... ]
Which is why I said, ",.. I would have preferred a similar post assuring us
from the Debian Side ..."
I didn't consider Mr. Wright or any of the posts from senior and
experienced List members such as you (I apologise for the typo in my
first post on the present thread, I meant members, not maintainers, it
was an inadvertent typo) when I said "a similar post".
What I meant was, something published as the Debian Wiki, Release
Notes, Debian GNU/Linux FAQ or other informative posts or webpages
that could help disseminate information about issues that matter. My
first post of this thread is illustrative.
I would prefer to wait until Debian includes other additional python
packages. A little supervision, information and guidance is what I
prefer, through the integrity and robustness of apt, the package
repository system and the information dissemination backbone.
Best wishes,
RKB
