On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 02:12:14PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On 10/06/2023 01:32, S M wrote: > > Yes. POSIX-compliance is a feature to me. I'd actually be fine with > > using dash itself but the lack of command line editing and filename > > completion is a deal-breaker to me.
> Is command-line editing part of POSIX, then? Are you suggesting that dash is > missing some bit of POSIX compliance? That's possible. There's no point debating any further. S M has a unique desire, which is not shared by any other person I've ever heard of, and they're going to do what they want.
