Greg Wooledge wrote: >> The "-o" means: "Write output image to FILE". And it does >> so, as far as I can see. > > The question is whether specifying "-o f f" where the output file > has the same name as the input file actually overwrites the original > input file. Another person reported that it does *not* -- that you get > a *.modified.jpeg file as output instead.
Does happen _without_ -o ... > If I had the first inkling of a clue what an exif tag > actually *was* I might try testing it myself. I'm gathering > that it has something to do with JPEG images, based on the > *.modified.jpeg default output filename. Beyond that, > I know nothing. > > One of you people who knows this software and has a testable > input file should (please!) try it, and show us the results. See the first post ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal
