On Tuesday, August 02, 2022 11:04:13 AM Andy Smith wrote: > But in reality you probably aren't ever going to have to take > any action with regard to IPv6.
... > Most of Sky's > customers will not know or care that at some point IPv6 got switched > on for them. Well, I know this is probably a silly worry, but I run behind an IPv4 NAT, which makes me feel fairly safe. I know that IPv6 is a much larger address space so, iiuc, it would be harder for a "cracker" to find IPv6, but I'd probably want to continue to run behind NAT, so the idea that I wouldn't even know if my ISP switched to IPv6 does not make me comfortable. But, no need for any replies -- I'll try to stay with IPv4 as long as I can. -- rhk If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML; avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma included at no charge.) If you change topics, change the Subject: line. Writing is often meant for others to read (legal agreements excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including liberal use of whitespace. If someone else has already responded to a question, decide whether any response you add will be helpful or not ... A picture is worth a thousand words -- divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and edit it to 10% of the original.
