Nano Nano([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Nano Nano([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > Question to all: I literally specify that you need automake 1.7 and > > > autoconf 2.50: is that wise? > > > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2, > > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells > > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest > > automake has aclocal-1.4. > > > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but > > thats me. > > > > I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj > and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj > is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".)
'apt-get -s -t unstable install automake' says I have the latest version and I just did an update yesterday. So SID != unstable?? Thats what confused me. Changing amver=1.7 to amver=1.4, in proj, allowed proj to finish without error. ./configure fails with Package atk was not found in the pkg-config search path No Joy. :-( > > But when I post 0.2 that has the automake;autoconf step already run, I > expect you won't have to have the matching automake/autoconf installed; > you'll just run ./configure. I'll take a bit of time and make the > README halfway decent, because I'll need to document schema.xml before > you can use it at all. > > Hang tight, and thanks for your eyes. Wilco, and thanks. Wayne -- Bad or missing mouse driver. Spank the cat [Y/N]? _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
