On Tuesday 11 January 2022 11:20:22 am Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > I've run nothing but linux since 1999,  starting with Slackware 4.0,  and 
> > upgrading to newer versions from time to time.  Early on I had no sound 
> > card in the machine that I was using,  and did not implement a GUI to start 
> > with either.  Adding those manually was a real interesting exercise,  one 
> > that I'm happy to not have to repeat with newer hardware and software.  
> > Debian came a little later,  only in the past few years,  and in many 
> > respects I'm still getting to know it.
> > 
> > I still would like to know why the one instance of pulseaudio works and the 
> > other one doesn't.  And why some things seem to be included in what gets 
> > started up that I don't see any need for -- things like exim,  bluetooth 
> > stuff (there is _no_ bluetooth hardware on this machine),  and some other 
> > stuff.  Any recommendations as to where I might poke at this to clean 
> > things up would be appreciated also.
> > 
> 
> Exim: because "something" needs to deliver mail locally for cron jobs etc. 
> Maybe not the best - others remove exim and install another MTA - but its
> a start.

I don't see the need for this.  Deliver mail locally where?  And to who?

> "Remove stuff" - start with a bare install of Debian text mode - standard
> packages only - then remove the stuff you want to. Don't be surprised if
> there may be a metapackage or two which appears to remove more than you
> think.

I've been surprised at that more than once already.  I suggest to synaptic that 
I might want to remove something,  and it comes back with a *huge* list of 
stuff that's going to be removed,  if I do.  I can't quite make sense out of 
that.
 
> The idea of a distribution is to make it relatively easy to install a 
> subset of common packages that people want: that doesn't mean that everybody
> gets exactly what they want first time, but Debian's fairly flexible to 
> allow you to change elements.

Still working on that...
 
> If you think that the distribution is entirely wrong - that's a different
> matter, I think. 

Not necessarily wrong,  but definitely different.  I like the management of 
dependencies,  one of the reasons I chose it.  Some of the other stuff I'm not 
so sure about,  though.

> If you started with Slackware 4.0 and that was your first 
> Linux, then you may well find Debian different enough that it's bothersome
> because it "isn't Slackware" - but there's any amount of individual 
> customisation you can do.

Oh,  it's different all right.  Bothersome?  Sometimes.  I've been dealing with 
it for some years now,  and haven't given up on it yet.

-- 
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space,  a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed.  --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James 
M Dakin

Reply via email to