December 26, 2021 1:25:30 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amaca...@einval.com> wrote:
> but that doesn't mean that everything marked as vulnerable is still at risk. I couldn't understand what you meant, and figured you were referring to some extra hardening done by Debian. Did some googling, and apparently, it's the opposite. Debian disables Chromium's own hardening? https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/Chromium#Chromium_Debian_Package_Security """ Thus, the Debian Chromium has substantially worsened security than an official version. However, despite this, it may still be more secure than Firefox (Firefox never had many of the disabled mitigations in the first place). """ > If you're unhappy with data presentation, feel free to contact the security > team Am I the only one unhappy with it? Are you happy with it? -- Sent with https://mailfence.com Secure and private email
