On Jo, 14 oct 21, 13:47:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 01:51:07PM -0300, Victor Hugo Muñoz wrote: > > And it looks that this worked! You were right, I had not the latest > > version, so I upgraded dpkg, and yes, texlive-base passed the > > installation without errors. > > Is this considered a bug in texlive-base, i.e. that it should contain a > Pre-Depends: on a specific version of dpkg? Or is it the case that *all* > of the packages in bookworm are going to have this issue, and so they're > not going to bother with a Pre-Depends: in every single package, but > instead will handle the dist-upgrade in some other way?
Packages are not allowed to use dpkg features that are not present in stable. In this particular case, according to the changelog 'dpkg' introduced that feature in 1.20.6, while stable already has 1.20.9. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
