On Saturday, September 25, 2021 06:32:16 PM The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-09-25 at 09:06, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, September 24, 2021 05:31:47 PM The Wanderer wrote: > >> Based on what I've found in digging earlier, as well as the name > >> mentioned by Andy Smith in his reply, I think it's probably > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994899 - > >> specifically. the first reply (comment 10). > > > > Not replying specifically to The Wanderer, but just to this post > > which mentions that the message at issue is #10, and noting that > > message was not written by Chuck and instead written by someone from > > the Debian side at least partially "critiquiing" Chuck's message #5. > > FAOD,
I had to look up the meaning of FAOD. Are you kidding me? What did I do or say to get a response like that? I may have misunderstood which message you were pointing to -- I was interested in the message that Chuck wrote that prompted all the criticism. So a misunderstanding about which message we each were talking about, but FAOD??? And if FAOD means what I found on the internet, that must violate the Debian CoC. > I understood the question I was responding to as asking which > message it was that contained the comments which Chuck was > characterizing as having "accused [him] in public of wrongdoing" - > which, naturally, would not have been written by Chuck.
