On 2021-09-03 00:21, Brian wrote:
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 00:03:08 +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-02 23:28, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Please go back and read your very first post. You asked three questions.
> Which one has not been answered?
Please understand you are talking to an idiot, you have to say things
slowly
for example if saned.service is >/dev/null why is it there at all ?
That's a foutth question. We assume the other three questions have been
addressed to your satisfaction. We aim for a happy user :).
The fourth question and its answer was also touched on earlier. The
file's
presence allows all the instances spawned by saned@.service to be
managed.
additional questions then:
Scanning with xsane is quite zippy but scanbd/press button is noticeably
slower to kick off.
Could this be to do with not passing options to scanimage ?
can I take options from xSane to give to scanbd/scanimage ?
are there reasons to use scanadf instead of scanimage?
mick
--
Key ID 4BFEBB31
