On 2021-08-14 2:44 p.m., Brian wrote: > On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 19:03:23 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> On 2021-08-12 6:27 p.m., Brian wrote: >>> On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 15:33:26 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >>> >>> Please give a link at the Mopria website substantiating your clain that >>> a Mopria certified device should be ca[able of accepting PDF as a PDL >>> in addition to PWG raster and PCLm. >>> >> I forgot some hard to find information from Wikipedia > > You also forgot to attempt to respond to a simple question. Curt > answered it satisfactorily. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/08/msg00624.html > > You could have said "I do not know". > >> If you doubt, 1st edit Wikipedia page and after this check the reference >> down the page. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mopria_Alliance >> >> *IPP* >> >> Windows 10 support for Mopria certified printers >> Microsoft implemented an IPP printing solution based on the Mopria >> standard in the Windows 10, version 1809 operating system. >> >> *autodiscovery* >> Mopria Print Service >> The Mopria Print Service for Android was released in the Google Play >> store in October 2014. It is a plug-in that enables printing from >> Android devices to Mopria certified printers and MFPs. >> >> A client uses mDNS to automatically discover a printer through the local >> 802.11 wireless network. The printer must be connected to the network >> either wirelessly or with an Ethernet cable. Mopria Print Service also >> supports printer connection through Wi-Fi Direct. > > Any doubts I have do not relate to a transpot or discovery protocol > but to a common PDL. As demonstrated at > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/08/msg00681.html > > this is the critical third factor. You have completely ignored it. > >>>> And all of the condition make a printer pretty much driver less. > > You only mention two conditions. A driverless printing situation > requires *three* conditions. > >>>> There's no link with you talking about AirPrint. > > This is where you go off the rails. I am utterly amazed that such > a syatement could be made in the context of a Debian installation. > These well meaning but ill-formed ideas really will have to revised > to match reality. > > A Mopria-certified printer is not a reliable indicator of driverless > printing being possible on Debian. >
If you say so, I'll agree with you because there's no use of arguing of who's winning and I never had the expectation to win. The only thing I know is that if you'd have read the Mopria site then you'd have looked at the FAQ and wouldn't have needed someone else to repeat you. I am referring to this particular message. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/08/msg00624.html I have already told you that it supported PDF and that all the information was on the Mopria website. I won't go back and write again all the message I've sent. The 3 condition are met, if you don't want to see it then I can't do more. You are somewhat crossing the line between acting in good faith and just acting in plain confrontation. Sorry, you are so beautiful, let me poke a knife thru my eye so I can better admire you. -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
