On Sun, 09 May 2021 17:38:06 -0400 The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> One possible difference is that the ones I've looked at (admittedly > nowhere near all of them) seem to expect the input to be in some other > format, to be translated into HTML etc., rather than letting you write > the HTML etc. directly and doing [whatever other things] with the > result. For example, the package description for pelican (which you > suggested earlier) says that it requires its input to be in Markdown > or rST. Right. However, as I found out asking elsewhere, you can include HTML in Markdown. For example, Markdown doesn't by itself provide targets for links. So in a glossary, I do this: * <a id="eprom"></a>EPROM: Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory, Now I can make a link to that target: ... and burn to ROM (or, more likely, [EPROM](#eprom)). Feel free to experiment with it. I suspect you might have to remove the <body> tags and everything outside them, and then have your static site generator provide those. That might end up being an advantage. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
pgplq6SYQ6QCR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
