On Mon 03 May 2021 at 11:23:51 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 01 mai 21, 08:31:04, Joe wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:25:20 -0400 > > Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > > > > viewing material because it's about ten years old. But when we > > > > inevitably replace it and have no choice about accepting a 'smart' > > > > TV, > > > > > > There are still normal TVs around. > > > > > > > Yes, but not many. We would want another 32" TV, and today the majority > > of those are not 'smart', in fact they're still advertised as 'HD Ready' > > i.e. 720 lines, after we've had 1080 line transmissions for many years. > > But our current TV may go on another ten years, by which time all TVs > > will be spying devices. > > Get a computer monitor instead. In ten years most (if not all) > traditional TV stations will likely have switched to streaming via the > internet anyway ;)
Couldn't possibly afford it. Our last two TVs were $234 (55") and $250 (43", inc Roku). It costs $330 for the cheapest 34" monitor at https://www.pcmag.com/deals/best-computer-monitor-deals-this-month The only walk-in monitor is $350 for 34" at BestBuy, but it has to be ultra-wide. (Both TVs were walk-ins.) Otherwise, it's down to 32" for $170 at Walmart, or 24" for $230 at Target. Cheers, David.