On Tuesday, March 09, 2021 04:05:38 PM Brett Pierce wrote: > Hi. > > Really looking forward to trying out this tool.
Are you talking about Debian? > Only... even though I've > been on computers since late 1980s but I'm not a geek - but not entirely > stupid either. Your website is really intimidating and confusing. ... and debian.org? > It's > very geeky to me, which means to many others as well. I was able to find > that there are two versions (at least) - one to use with Gimp, the other to > use without it (I already use an old photoshop version CS3.) I'm on your > download page for standalone. I can't find where to download. The page is, > like your site, confusing. There are lots of individual bits and pieces to > download - but seriously they sound like extras. But it's not clear. I'm > struggling to download, to know what to do. I'm from outside your > world, all those different terms are not my language. My mind just says... > no idea what this is or whether I need it. > > Can I suggest you get a straight-talking non-geek who knows nothing about > your software and give them several scenarios (eg, A. You want to edit raw > files for your photos. You want to download this to do it. B. You want to > edit raw files but you already have an image editor like photoshop) and no > help and watch them figure it out? No help, no tips. Get their feedback. On > the basis of how simple or not it is for them, redesign your site in Plain > English, decluttered, clear instructions for the basics in big headings, > and separate the more geeky stuff into sections with clear headings that > help people like me to ignore it unless I am looking for a, b or c? Two > levels - clear obvious instructions and information for those who just want > to get started. Level two - lots of detailed choices and options for people > who know what they're looking for. > > I'll go back to trying to work out how to download. I'm sure I'll solve it, > but it should be brain dead obvious. > Your software is precisely what I'm after - looking forward to trying it > out. I spent the time here writing this to support what you're doing. > > Thanks, > Brett > ᐧ
