On Wed 03 Mar 2021 at 10:27:42 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, March 02, 2021 06:29:15 PM Brian wrote: > > On Tue 02 Mar 2021 at 16:19:45 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 02, 2021 02:55:08 PM Brian wrote: > > > > On Mon 01 Mar 2021 at 08:13:13 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > No. Providing a reasonable explanatory text about why some other > > > installer may be required and a link to a place where you can find one > > > or more. > > > > My installer is aimed at users with an adapter that uses the p54usb > > driver. It requires firmware that needs to be extracted from the device > > and there aren't any such files in the non-free archive. I imagine there > > are other similar devices. > > > > I can easlily provide explanatory text about why my installer is needed > > and why it would benefit users. Would it be ok to have it in unofficial > > as a non-Debian installer? > > > > Just a thought! > > If you're asking me specifically, I'll say fine with me, as long as there is > something on the official installer page that reasonably "nicely" explains > that > some people may require an unofficial installer, and a little bit about why, > and > points to a page that leads that person to a variety of installers that might > fill her needs. > > Others may have additional (or different) thoughts.
There are at least half a dozen www.debian.org pages that point to a non-Debian installation image. Andrei POPESCU has given one route: https://www.debian.org/distrib/ What's the problem? -- Brian.
