On Wed 17 Feb 2021 at 11:33:11 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote: > David Wright wrote: > > > > The only realistic suggestion I've read here is from tom??s, > > who seems to be expressing some sort of shim dispatcher. > > And I await a thought-out solution from the virtualisation crowd. > > I mean, that's easy, but it doesn't solve the stated problem. > Each VM is a notional machine, and each machine has one MTA.
Yes, sorry; I was thinking about Stefan's comment about "running two different SMTP servers on two different interfaces", which seems to be +some+ sort of use case. Might they then be able to deliver to the a common MDA? > It's probably great for learning about all the MTAs, but the > original requester desperately wants to install multiple MTAs > on the same machine at the same time. And the OP's use case? "For convenience when one evaluating or learning between multiple MTAs etc." As I first wrote, why not two machines, each one with a different MTA, and then studying their interoperation. Or as Greg just put it: → ↑ ↓ ← Cheers, David.