On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:30 PM Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote: > > You don't want a bond, you want a bridge. > > Bonding takes two interfaces that talk to the same switch on the > other side, and makes them into one bond nic. You need support > on the switch, too, which is unlikely in a D-Link 8-port unless > it has a management interface -- I think they don't bother under > 16 or 24 ports, and even then it's an extra-cost option. Thank you for pointers, this is a test switch at home but of course we have bigger Cisco switches at office which have management interface. It look like LACP needs to be checked/enabled on ports which needs to be used in network bonding. Thank you.
- In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while... Jaikumar Sharma
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pinga... Dan Ritter
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not p... deloptes
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not p... Jaikumar Sharma
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not p... Jaikumar Sharma
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is n... Dan Ritter
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) ... Lee
- Re: In network bonding second nic (e... Dan Ritter
- Re: In network bonding second ni... Lee
- Re: In network bonding secon... Jaikumar Sharma
- Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) ... Jaikumar Sharma
- Re: In network bonding second nic (e... Dan Ritter
- Re: In network bonding second ni... deloptes