On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 11:27:47 -0400 Celejar <cele...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:06:22 +0200 > <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote: > > > Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > What else besides XFCE and "common" desktop software (e.g. mail > > > > client, LibreOffice, etc.)? > > > > > > > And instead of being a condescending arse you might want to ask > > > for information that's actually relevant. > > > > I may be wrong, but I think you're over-interpreting Andrei here. > > I've the feeling he's genuinely trying to help. Blame the channel. > > +1 > > Andrei is one of the most helpful and gracious people on this list. > There's probably nuance that isn't correctly coming across via email. > Look, I point out an issue with a normal systemd service, which I found because my laptop was slow and running a load average of 15+, with lots of systemd-user-runtime-dir processes in D state causing that load.
I traced it down to user-runtime-dir@UID.service crashing on cleaning up a /run/user/UID directory. I gave relevant information, and Andrei is asking if I have LibreOffice installed, and points me to ESR's FAQ. I'm very sorry, but that feels extremely condescending. I'm *not* some newbie just in from Ubuntu. When I provide information, I expect to be queried on relevant points. As it turns out I found some more information: the kernel oopses when it audits the unlink call when SELinux is enabled. Since that looks like a bug in kernel/systemd interaction, I'm filing a bug report with full information (including the oops output). Since this laptop is the only one running SELinux in permissive mode (because I'm still working out its policy), I'm not losing much to disable it for now. Mart
