On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 16:07:29 (+0100), Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:00:03 +0300 Reco <recovery...@enotuniq.net> wrote: > > >I agree. But it's a valid part of a e-mail body, and any MUA that > >mishandles that is broken in this regard. > > I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that one > expects to happen (non quoting of text after a valid sig separator) > because Tomas has DELIBERATELY, broken his, don't occur. When asked to > correct the problem, Tomas' answer boiled down to "No".
I'm not really sure what the implications are of Reco's post about kmail's alleged bug. But surely, if kmail has a bug, then isn't the correct path to report it? > The Wanderer couched his response to that far more politely than I would > have done. That might be because The Wanderer was responding to some information in Reco's post. It was much more informative than "It doesn't work." > Since Tomas refuses to play nice, I've dealt with the issue in my own > way. I like to clean out all the salutations and valedictions from material I quote, so a one-line signature like -- t's is more helpful to me than long rambling signatures. (It sometimes transpires that people don't even stand by the quotations their own signatures contain.) Cheers, David.
