On 1/7/20 4:51 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 7:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:

Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 6/29/20 9:10 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:

Miles Fidelman wrote:
Now who's being pedantic?
Precisely.

And isn't this exactly what I said??? mdadm is an admin program, it doesn't
perform the raid function.
And it's OK to refer to the whole thing as an mdadm RAID.
No.. if you want to be pedantic, the proper terminology is "Linux Raid" or
"md RAID."?? mdadm is one of several admin programs available
What are the others, please? (That will work on a modern system,
say, Debian stable or oldstable or unstable.)

I think there's precisely one -- libblockdev2.


lvm does its own raid now too...


https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/9kkk3b/md_raid_lvm_vs_lvm_raid/




saying "mdadm raid" is like saying "libvert hypervisor" - when what you
really mean is Xen, or KVM, or ESXI - accessed through libvert

When you're building systems, details matter.
libvirt.

-dsr-

--
Born again Christians are a pain because the second birth was

Reply via email to