Lee wrote: > Maybe I'm being naive, but I'm taking the clause "except as may be > required by law" to mean they can't just give the data to LE; there > has to be some kind of court order compelling them to hand it over.
Reco writes: > Probably. But I fail to see how a court order will prevent such data > leak in the described scenario. The point is that if there is a court order then the data *will* be handed over regardless of what the contract says. "But I promised this guy that I'd wouldn't reveal his secrets to the government" carries no weight in court. The clause makes it clear that data will be handed over if and only if there is a court order. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
