On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 12:42:17 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote: > > > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin > > > or a non-Latin language, > > > > I think we can agree that the Romans spoke Latin! > > Err... Romanian is not the language that was spoken in Rome.
Neither is Italian. > It is, however, considered a "Romance language", meaning it has Latin > as one of its primary roots. I took David Wright's comment to have a historical aspect to it. In which case, no one can disagree with it. -- Brian.
