On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 01:29:47PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 06:59:29PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > >>> Debian's decisions on apache layout were made years earlier. > >>> > >>> Extra configuration for apache2 should be put in conf.d > > >> Hmmm, seems contradictory here. > >> > >> You say extra apache2 configuration should be placed on `conf.d`, > >> > >> but Debian layout use `sites-{available,enabled}` and > >> > >> `conf-{available,enabled}`. Do you mean upstream layout or something else? > > > Conf.d is for configuration which isn't per-site or per-module. > > Are you sure? > > I don't see anything including conf.d in a current Apache2 configuration > on Buster.
[...] You're probably right. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature